If you need assistance with a business or personal legal matter in New Jersey or New York, contact a business litigation lawyer at the Kridel Law Group.
A New Jersey Supreme Court case from 1970 – 1977 which matter is currently taught in every law school in the country as the leading case in the area of mandating upon a landlord the duty to mitigate its damages. This is one of the seminal cases in New Jersey and now the country in landlord tenan... Read On
A large, complex sexual harassment suit. Mr. Kridel successfully obtained a complete dismissal in favor of the employer from the EEOC after almost eight (8) years in Federal Court before the Honorable Harold A. Ackerman with the Honorable Stanley R. Chesler acting as Magistrate in the U.S. Distri... Read On
We represented the plaintiff in this matter who was the tenant of approximately ten (10) leases at the Willowbrook Mall, owned by the defendant, The Rouse Company. This case is of significance since during the litigation and after extensive discovery the defendant refunded in excess of seven (7) ... Read On
This firm represented the Defendant Corporation, the individuals of which were alleged by plaintiff to have violated noncompetition employment agreements and the theft of trade secrets. This case was heard before the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, venued in Hudson County. The matter w... Read On
This firm represented the plaintiff in a breach of contract case well in excess of seven (7) figures. The matter was settled after extensive discovery by the payment to plaintiff of its lost profits and the receipt of future business notwithstanding the litigation. Defendant was represented by Ca... Read On
This firm represented the plaintiff as Joint Counsel with the Law Firm of Michael A. Manna & Associates, P.C. alleging psychiatric malpractice against the defendant doctor for sexually abusing his patients. Prior to institution of the suit, both firms surreptitiously wired the Plaintiff and obtai... Read On
This firm represented a secondary mortgage company who was defrauded by the defendant involved in a $55 million real estate scam. This firm's client had loaned in excess of seven (7) figures to the Defendant. The matter was initiated by this Firm on an Order to Show Cause seeking temporary restra... Read On
This firm represented the defendant in this matter, an international stock surveillance corporation, who hired a former employee of Knight-Ritter to head its Chicago offices. Knight-Ritter brought this matter before the Supreme Court of the State of New York, venued in New York County, by way of ... Read On
This firm represented plaintiff in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, venued in New York County having brought an Order to Show Cause, Verified Complaint precluding one of Carson's former employees from working on certain accounts, formerly serviced by The Carson Group and for other conj... Read On
This firm represented the plaintiff in an insurance malpractice claim against the agent of State Farm Insurance alleging that the broker had led the alleged insured to believe she had obtained a life insurance policy on her late husband. Notwithstanding the admission that Plaintiff had received a... Read On
This firm represented the plaintiff in the above matter which alleged that the defendant and its principal defrauded plaintiff by falsifying radio frequency transistors in an international transaction for an airport in Italy. The matter was tried to conclusion before the Honorable Judge Robert J.... Read On
The defendant was the largest video dating service in the City of New York with offices situate on 57th Street. This firm represented Peoples Resources for approximately ten (10) years and in particular, insulated them from the statutory requirements for social referral services by convincing the... Read On
This firm represented Together, which was one of the largest national dating services. This firm acted as General Counsel and appeared on behalf of the client in Supreme Court of the State of New York and the Federal Courts of the State of New York on numerous litigated matters. During its repres... Read On
State of New York sought to subject the client as an excise tax pursuant to Section 183-e which applied to communication companies in general. The firm was able to differentiate the services provided by the client so as to avoid same from falling within the definitional section of the Statute and... Read On
This matter was a contractual dispute between the parties in which this firm represented the defendant alleging that the contract negotiated and signed by the parties should not be enforced by reason of duress and/or undo influence. The matter originally rose as a result of the displeasure of the... Read On
This matter was a title dispute having resulted from this firm obtaining a judgment against several individuals for approximately $300,000.00, one of whom sold property to the Borough of Edgewater. Upon discovering same, this firm commenced litigation naming certain individuals as well as the Bor... Read On
This was an adversary proceeding against Capital Resources which had filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Court. The matter was venued before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey before the Honorable Daniel J. Moore... Read On
This is a current matter before the Honorable Clarkson S. Fisher, Jr. in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, Law Division, Monmouth County. The issues are somewhat complex in that this Firm represents a lender known as LBJ Realty, whose mortgaged lien was inappropriately removed. There... Read On
This is one of long line of cases in which this firm represented plaintiffs against contractors involving violations of the Home Improvement Act (N.J.A.C. 13:45a-16 et seq) which pursuant to Cox v. Sears are per se violations of the Consumer Fraud Act. This matter was settled for a substantial su... Read On
This is an ongoing matter presently before the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, Law Division, venued in Passaic County. This firm represents the plaintiff who engaged the services of the defendant construction company to construct a major addition and renovation to his residence. This f... Read On
Phone: 212-924-1625
Review Us